The development of institutional investors, and their growing Essay

The development of institutional investors, and their growing dominance as owners of modern corporations, has had a deep impact - Essay Example The concern is that deficiencies in the monitoring of institutional shareholders have led to a quality of oversight far below that which is required, being reactionary and passive in the exercise of their voting rights. They are perceived to be ineffective in challenging boards, relegating their decisions to proxy advisers or alternatively constraining management to decide in favour of short-term financial profits at the expense of more prudent long-term benefits. This study conducts an inquiry into the academic literature on the role currently played by institutional investors in corporate governance. The study may provide insight into the control and accountability procedures in the large domestic and foreign corporations, since these are the entities which cause the greatest damage in every global financial crisis. Defining corporate governance Corporate governance is ‘the system of laws, rules, and factors that control operations at a company.’2 It has developed into a major area of concern because potential conflicts of interest (otherwise known as agency problems) tend to arise among stakeholders in the corporate structure. It generally assumes the inevitability that ownership and control are separate in public corporations, where management which exercises control over operations acts as agents of the owners or shareholders. Agency problems tend to arise from two sources: (1) the differences in the goals and preferences among the stakeholders; and (2) the lack of perfect information among stakeholders about each other’s knowledge, actions, and preferences. Corporate governance consists of the set of structures that define the boundaries for firms’ operations. Among the factors influencing corporate governance are the board of directors, laws and regulations, labour contracts, the competitive environment, and the market for corporate.3 The board of directors is the significant driver of internal control in the governance of the corporation because it has the right to hire, fire, and compensate managers. The party which drives the external control mechanism of corporations, however, would be the institutional investors who own equity in the corporation. In light of the recent financial crisis, institutional investors are gaining increasing importance due to what is perceived to be the failure of the board of directors to maintain sufficient internal control over the corporation. The effectiveness of their control, however, is still a matter of debate due in part to the difficulty of isolating and identifying those changes in corporate conduct that are attributable directly to the workings of the institutional shareholders. The formulation of corporate governance guidelines is the means by which a firm may seek to reduce agency costs (the consequences of the separation of ownership and control). Agency costs come in the form in the cost of hiring management personnel, and from costs incurred due to divergenc e in the acts of management from the wishes and interests of the owners of the business. Institutional share